<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mutiny on the Bounty!  How Vision Boosts Employee Engagement and Keeps Your Team from Revolting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewpmoore.com/intraprenurship/mutiny-on-the-bounty-how-vision-boosts-employee-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewpmoore.com/intraprenurship/mutiny-on-the-bounty-how-vision-boosts-employee-engagement/</link>
	<description>Inside Out Leadership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 01:49:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewpmoore.com/intraprenurship/mutiny-on-the-bounty-how-vision-boosts-employee-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 03:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewpmoore.com/?p=492#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Andrew you have hit the nail on the head, however I believe that there is more to the argument on vision.  I believe that many organizations exist with only one thing in mind, to appease or impress stockholders.

Herb Kelleher got it right when he said, &quot;The business of business is people.&quot;  In every organization people are what makes the organization achieve success or failure.  Vision is the long term ideal.  However, the military uses the word mission completely different than any other organization.  A mission should be the short term goal that leads to the success of the vision.

I have had employers tell me that no one really cares about all of that touchy feely stuff that makes up vision, mission, values.  I obviously do not agree with those sentiments.  Vision, mission and values are more important than competitive advantage any day.  The reason?  Because people are the ones moving toward something and people have emotions.  Emotions are what we are essentially talking about.  Either the engagement is there or it is not, but the emotional tie to doing a good job has to have a larger purpose than just doing a job.

This all ties back into the culture of the organization.  How many people in organizations feel that they can&#039;t bring a good idea to the table?  How many people long to actually contribute to the overall good?  The old days of just nine to five are long gone, people want to be a part of something they can believe in.  When they lose that belief; disengagement becomes the status quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew you have hit the nail on the head, however I believe that there is more to the argument on vision.  I believe that many organizations exist with only one thing in mind, to appease or impress stockholders.</p>
<p>Herb Kelleher got it right when he said, &#8220;The business of business is people.&#8221;  In every organization people are what makes the organization achieve success or failure.  Vision is the long term ideal.  However, the military uses the word mission completely different than any other organization.  A mission should be the short term goal that leads to the success of the vision.</p>
<p>I have had employers tell me that no one really cares about all of that touchy feely stuff that makes up vision, mission, values.  I obviously do not agree with those sentiments.  Vision, mission and values are more important than competitive advantage any day.  The reason?  Because people are the ones moving toward something and people have emotions.  Emotions are what we are essentially talking about.  Either the engagement is there or it is not, but the emotional tie to doing a good job has to have a larger purpose than just doing a job.</p>
<p>This all ties back into the culture of the organization.  How many people in organizations feel that they can&#8217;t bring a good idea to the table?  How many people long to actually contribute to the overall good?  The old days of just nine to five are long gone, people want to be a part of something they can believe in.  When they lose that belief; disengagement becomes the status quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stump</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewpmoore.com/intraprenurship/mutiny-on-the-bounty-how-vision-boosts-employee-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewpmoore.com/?p=492#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Andrew you have hit the nail on the head, however I believe that there is more to the argument on vision.  I believe that many organizations exist with only one thing in mind, to appease or impress stockholders.

Herb Kelleher got it right when he said, &quot;The business of business is people.&quot;  In every organization people are what makes the organization achieve success or failure.  Vision is the long term ideal.  However, the military uses the word mission completely different than any other organization.  A mission should be the short term goal that leads to the success of the vision.

I have had employers tell me that no one really cares about all of that touchy feely stuff that makes up vision, mission, values.  I obviously do not agree with those sentiments.  Vision, mission and values are more important than competitive advantage any day.  The reason?  Because people are the ones moving toward something and people have emotions.  Emotions are what we are essentially talking about.  Either the engagement is there or it is not, but the emotional tie to doing a good job has to have a larger purpose than just doing a job.

This all ties back into the culture of the organization.  How many people in organizations feel that they can&#039;t bring a good idea to the table?  How many people long to actually contribute to the overall good?  The old days of just nine to five are long gone, people want to be a part of something they can believe in.  When they lose that belief; disengagement becomes the status quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew you have hit the nail on the head, however I believe that there is more to the argument on vision.  I believe that many organizations exist with only one thing in mind, to appease or impress stockholders.</p>
<p>Herb Kelleher got it right when he said, &#8220;The business of business is people.&#8221;  In every organization people are what makes the organization achieve success or failure.  Vision is the long term ideal.  However, the military uses the word mission completely different than any other organization.  A mission should be the short term goal that leads to the success of the vision.</p>
<p>I have had employers tell me that no one really cares about all of that touchy feely stuff that makes up vision, mission, values.  I obviously do not agree with those sentiments.  Vision, mission and values are more important than competitive advantage any day.  The reason?  Because people are the ones moving toward something and people have emotions.  Emotions are what we are essentially talking about.  Either the engagement is there or it is not, but the emotional tie to doing a good job has to have a larger purpose than just doing a job.</p>
<p>This all ties back into the culture of the organization.  How many people in organizations feel that they can&#8217;t bring a good idea to the table?  How many people long to actually contribute to the overall good?  The old days of just nine to five are long gone, people want to be a part of something they can believe in.  When they lose that belief; disengagement becomes the status quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter A Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewpmoore.com/intraprenurship/mutiny-on-the-bounty-how-vision-boosts-employee-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter A Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewpmoore.com/?p=492#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Andrew
You got it bang on when you said&quot;Align the company goals with individual goals&quot;
The mistake most often made is when management try to align the workforce with their goals.
The secret to engagement is to trust, and value the workforce, When that does not happen is when the frustration that you describe occurs.

If management truly value the workforce they will understand and share their vision. when that happens the workforce will choose to engage.

Peter A Hunter
www.breakingthemould.co.uk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew<br />
You got it bang on when you said&#8221;Align the company goals with individual goals&#8221;<br />
The mistake most often made is when management try to align the workforce with their goals.<br />
The secret to engagement is to trust, and value the workforce, When that does not happen is when the frustration that you describe occurs.</p>
<p>If management truly value the workforce they will understand and share their vision. when that happens the workforce will choose to engage.</p>
<p>Peter A Hunter<br />
<a href="http://www.breakingthemould.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.breakingthemould.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

